ID3 vTOPE NPRTCOM TALB Day to DayTIT2 - Slate's Jurisprudence: U.S. Supreme Court TVTCOP 2006TRCK 2TCON AnalysisCOMM nprComment A bill moving through the U.S. Senate would force the U.S. Supreme Court to televise its oral arguments -- a move strongly opposed by the nine justices, who have historically resisted electronic coverage of court proceedings, and only recently allowed audio recordings of selected case arguments. Madeleine Brand discusses the reasons behind the proposal with Slate legal analyst Dahlia Lithwick.TPE1 NPRTYER 2006 P , ^AybK3^;ovׯXb)N'="f'62@G 5S`D]W%ٺLyg_ajeYCt?9p=>}id ՙK?{R) ch麕N5hgs"o|=tj,Sf<̉fL!P; t` _@&ؓw'
]Ҡ"KlWX`R[,"Ds8j%D>,g_z/1tr/}c
qٓ%"L;FEzTjFl{rP8QEJhQ[ҒI;#-
lUb,kO+/Ӝb'fʇNSZPU
cA@y13ʼnl rjgdRc*5Lr#"QMݔvFe"tVi]<}u1ёiJEgvWC4*{*lN,7h6[:(SS,4]D9sKhj){t՝ּwƍ~Ծ[FWrIٵe;pKK2UPq
` _AUC`|)s.}Y|`B>쎅DžI
ͼZmZ\VBs9@)r@R$I?bc,#7!d0F&Q
h)fn(*f蜶`Ff[ v/,07W -G#T(=ҽ2}llTbyY&ݴP E
͉,AFg؊ר$ԋwoiٲ*b;H˲?=x's%
܀+FB̧$JrzVklkP (
q&A9@覦T}9!9eSy!biq(9CxN` Ƶr
:Mח6do(#*gyUBH